Page 201 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo quốc tế: Ứng dụng công nghệ mới trong công trình xanh - lần thứ 9 (ATiGB 2024)
P. 201

192                              TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM KỸ THUẬT - ĐẠI HỌC ĐÀ NẴNG

               from  multiple  researchers  that  tested  and  expanded   85-92, 1996.
               the  Technology  Acceptance  Model  while  examining   [10].  S.  Devaraj,  M.  Fan,  and  R.  Kohli,  "Antecedents  of  B2C
               the  SN  variable  and  the  impact  of  different  study   channel  satisfaction and preference: validating e-commerce
               settings on the results obtained                    metrics," Information systems research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.
                                                                   316-333, 2002.
                  The  correlations  between  TAM2  variables  and   [11].  T.  Dyba,  N.  B. Moe,  and  E.  M. Mikkelsen,  "An  empirical
               intention to use were confirmed. Figure 2 presents the   investigation  on  factors  affecting  software  developer
               ultimate  model,  showcasing  the  path  coefficients   acceptance  and  utilization  of  electronic  process  guides,"  in
               obtained  from  our  structural  equation  modeling   10th  International  Symposium  on  Software  Metrics,  2004.
               (SEM) investigation.                                Proceedings., 2004, pp. 220-231: IEEE.
                                                              [12].  P.  V.-C.  Chang,  "The  validity  of  an  extended  technology
                  A lack of correlation coefficients is revealed in the   acceptance  model  (TAM)  for  predicting  intranet/portal
               relationship between perceived norms and behavioral   usage," 2004.
               intentions. Undoubtedly, a more significant amount of   [13].  M.  Koufaris,  "Applying  the  technology  acceptance  model
               data will yield more precise outcomes.              and flow theory to online consumer behavior," Information
                                                                   systems research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 205-223, 2002.
                  Managers  should  not  only  prioritize  enhancing   [14].  C.-L.  Hsu  and  H.-P.  Lu,  "Why  do  people  play  on-line
               individual   employee   acceptance   when   using   games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow
               technology  in  their  firm.  It  is  important  to   experience," Information & management, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp.
               acknowledge and address the pressures on customers'   853-868, 2004.
               use of technology. So the entire department and firm   [15].  S.-S.  Liaw  and  H.-M.  Huang,  "An  investigation  of  user
               should develop a favorable attitude towards accepting   attitudes  toward  search  engines  as  an  information  retrieval
               the  system.  Support  is  recommended  throughout  the   tool,"  Computers  in  human  behavior,  Vol.  19,  No.  6,
                                                                   pp. 751-765, 2003.
               organization, which could involve creating a thorough
               training  program  and  setting  up  a  permanent  help   [16].  M.  Fishbein  and  I.  Ajzen,  "Attitudes  and  voting  behavior:
                                                                   An application of the theory of reasoned action," Progress in
               desk in a positive organizational environment.      applied social psychology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 253-313, 1981.
                              REFERENCES                      [17].  I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational
                                                                   behavior and human decision processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp.
               [1]. T. O. Lehtinen, M. V. Mäntylä, J. Vanhanen, J. Itkonen, and C.   179-211, 1991.
                  Lassenius,  "Perceived  causes  of  software  project  failures–An
                  analysis  of  their  relationships,"  Information  and  Software   [18].  P. Zhang, S. N. Aikman, and H. Sun, "Two types of attitudes
                  Technology, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 623-643, 2014.   in  ICT  acceptance  and  use,"  Intl.  Journal  of  Human–
               [2]. P.  Surendran,  "Technology  acceptance  model:  A  survey  of   Computer Interaction, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 628-648, 2008.
                  literature,"  International  journal  of  business  and  social   [19].  V.  Venkatesh and  F.  D.  Davis,  "A theoretical  extension of
                  research, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 175-178, 2012.      the  technology  acceptance  model:  Four  longitudinal  field
                                                                   studies," Management science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204,
               [3]. F.  D.  Davis,  R.  P.  Bagozzi,  and  P.  R.  Warshaw,  "User   2000.
                  acceptance  of  computer  technology:  A  comparison  of  two
                  theoretical models," Management science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp.   [20].  L. Robinson Jr, G. W. Marshall, and M. B. Stamps, "Sales
                  982-1003, 1989.                                  force  use  of  technology:  antecedents  to  technology
                                                                   acceptance," Journal of Business research, vol. 58, no. 12,
               [4]. C. M. Cheung, M. K. Lee, and Z. Chen, "Using the Internet as   pp. 1623-1631, 2005.
                  a learning medium: an exploration of gender difference in the
                  adoption  of  FaBWeb,"  in  Proceedings  of  the  35th  Annual   [21].  J.-H. Wu and S.-C. Wang, "What drives mobile commerce?:
                  Hawaii  International  Conference  on  System  Sciences,  2002,   An  empirical  evaluation  of  the  revised  technology
                  pp. 475-483: IEEE.                               acceptance  model,"  Information  &  management,  Vol.  42,
                                                                   No. 5, pp. 719-729, 2005.
               [5]. C. K. Riemenschneider, D. A. Harrison, and P. P. Mykytyn Jr,
                  "Understanding  IT  adoption  decisions  in  small  business:   [22].  M.  W.-L.  Cheung,  Meta-analysis:  A  structural  equation
                  integrating current theories," Information & management, Vol.   modeling approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
                  40, No. 4, pp. 269-285, 2003.               [23].  L.  V.  Hedges,  "A  random  effects  model  for  effect  sizes,"
               [6]. P.  Roberts  and  R.  Henderson,  "Information  technology   Psychological bulletin, Vol. 93, No. 2, p. 388, 1983.
                  acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the   [24].  M. Featherman and M. Fuller, "Applying TAM to e-services
                  technology  acceptance  model,"  Interacting  with  Computers,   adoption:  the  moderating  role  of  perceived  risk,"  in  36th
                  Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 427-443, 2000.               Annual  Hawaii  International  Conference  on  System
               [7]. A.  S.  Lau,  J.  Yen,  and  P.  Y.  Chau,  "Adoption  of  On-line   Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the, 2003, p. 11 pp.: IEEE.
                  Trading  in  the  Hong  Kong  Financial  Market,"  J.  Electron.   [25].   H. V. Nguyen, T. D. Vu, B. K. Nguyen, T. M. N. Nguyen, B.
                  Commer. Res., Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 58-65, 2001.    Do,  and  N.  Nguyen,  "Evaluating  the  impact  of  e-service
               [8]. M.  S.  Featherman  and  P.  A.  Pavlou,  "Predicting  e-services   quality  on  customer  intention  to  use  video  teller  machine
                  adoption:  a  perceived  risk  facets  perspective,"  International   services," Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market,
                  Journal of Human-computer Studies, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 451-  and Complexity, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 167, 2022.
                  474, 2003.
               [9]. B.  Szajna,  "Empirical  evaluation  of  the  revised  technology
                  acceptance model," Management science,  Vol. 42, No. 1, pp.

               ISBN: 978-604-80-9779-0
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206