Page 198 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo quốc tế: Ứng dụng công nghệ mới trong công trình xanh - lần thứ 9 (ATiGB 2024)
P. 198

th
               HỘI THẢO QUỐC TẾ ATiGB LẦN THỨ CHÍN - The 9 ATiGB 2024                                  189

                           A META-ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF

                       SUBJECTIVE NORMS IN INFORMATION

                                TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE


                                                           1*
                                                                          2
                                              Nguyen Van Noi , Cao Thi Xuan My
                             1 Faculty of Engineering Technology, Tien Giang University; nguyenvanoi@tgu.edu.vn
                2 Civil Engineering Department, The University of Technology and Education, the University of Da Nang, ctxmy@ute.udn.vn
                                                   * nguyenvannoi@tgu.edu.vn
                  Abstract: We performed a quantitative meta-analysis on   significant for managers in internal corporate operations and
               prior studies of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)   market-based environments.
               to  examine  the  influence  of  subjective  norms.  The  first   Keywords:  Technology  acceptance  model;  Meta‐
               hypotheses  were  examined.  The  findings  demonstrated  a   analytic  structural  equation  modeling;  Subjective  norms;
               notable impact of subjective norms on perceived usefulness   Effect sizes; Random effects models.
               and  behavioral  intention  to  use.  These  findings  are
                  1. INTRODUCTION                             populations  [8-10]  across  various  technologies,
                                                              including  micro-computers  and  other  domains  [11-
                  Introducing  Information  Technology  (IT)  into   13], and in Western cultures as well as other contexts
               business processes can yield substantial benefits, such   [14, 15].
               as  improved  efficiency,  enhanced  communication,
               and  better  data  management.  However,  companies   The  objective  of  our  study  was  to  provide  a
               often   encounter   several   challenges   when   concise  summary  of  the  associations  between  PEU,
               implementing  IT  solutions.  These  issues  can  arise   PU,  attitudes,  and  intention.  Our  objective  was  to
               from  various  technological,  organizational,  and   examine  the  relationships  between  these  constructs
               human  components.  Lehtinen,  E.  et  al.  found  that   using  a  meta-analytical  structural  equation  model
               52%  of  information  systems  (IS)  and  software   (MASEM).  In  addition,  our  research  included  the
               engineering  projects  experienced  delays,  exceeded   subjective norms (SN), and we also investigated the
               their  budget,  and  did  not  match  the  expected   impact  of  three  different  settings  as  moderating
               functionality [1]. Researchers have sought to identify   variables.
               elements influencing an individual's acceptance of IT   2.  THE  TECHNOLOGY  ACCEPTANCE
               and  enhancing  its  usage.  In  this  context,  the   MODEL   (TAM)   CONCERNING      THE
               Technology  Acceptance  Model  (TAM)  is  a  widely   ACCEPTANCE OF IT
               used  research  framework  for  predicting  individual   The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is based
               users' adoption and acceptance of IS and technology   on the Theory of Reasoned Action [16] and the Theory
               [2].  The  Technology  Acceptance  Model  (TAM),   of Planned Behavior [17]. It explains the elements that
               developed  by  Davis  et  al.  [3],  is  one  of  the  most   influence the use of technology and the intent to use it.
               influential research models for determining the level   Multiple iterations of the Technology Acceptance Model
               of    IS  adoption  at  the  individual  level.  The  main   (TAM) have been developed,  with  some incorporating
               variables  in  TAM  are  perceived  ease  of  use  (PEU)   external factors and others exclusively emphasizing the
               and perceived usefulness (PU).
                                                              actual utilization of technology as an outcome measure.
                  While TAM has been employed, elaborated upon,   Nevertheless,  the  core  factors  in  TAM  remain
               and  replicated  in  several  studies,  certain  aspects   unchanged:  Perceptions  of  how  easy  it  is  to  use,
               remain ambiguous. PU, as defined by Davis [3], is the   perceptions  of  how  valuable  it  is,  attitudes  towards
               degree to which an individual believes that utilizing a   technology, and intents to utilize technology [3].
               particular   system   would   improve   their   job   Perceived ease of use refers to an individual's belief
               performance.  People  tend  to  adopt  or  reject  an   that technology will require minimal effort and be user-
               application based on their perception of its ability to   friendly. Similarly, the perceived utility of technology is
               improve their work. Several studies found significant   the  extent  to  which  an  individual  believes  that  using
               effects of it on the dependent variables [4, 5], while   technology would improve their job performance (Davis,
               others  found  no  conclusive  effects  [6,  7].  Secondly,   1986). Attitude can be described as the extent to which
               limited consensus exists regarding the diverse settings   an individual possesses a positive or negative assessment
               in  which  TAM  has  been  tested.  Researchers  have   or  judgment  of  actions  [17].  An  individual's  holistic
               examined  TAM  with  both  student  and  non-student
                                                                                   ISBN: 978-604-80-9779-0
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203