Page 233 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo quốc tế: Ứng dụng công nghệ mới trong công trình xanh - lần thứ 9 (ATiGB 2024)
P. 233

224                              TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM KỸ THUẬT - ĐẠI HỌC ĐÀ NẴNG

               stakeholders,  and  future  research  endeavors.  By   critical analysis,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 23, no. 1,
               highlighting the environmental and economic benefits   pp.   216–224,   2012.   https://doi.org/10.1016/
               of circular economy principles and offering practical   j.jclepro.2011.07.005.
               examples  of  their  implementation,  the  paper   [7].   EDGE, “Edge,”  Edge.  https://edge.tech/case-study  (accessed
               contributes valuable insights to the ongoing discourse   Mar. 4, 2024).
               on  sustainability  in  the  construction  industry.  It   [8]. N.  Sharma,  P.  P. Kalbar,  and M.  Salman, “Global  review  of
                                                                 circular  economy  and  life  cycle  thinking  in  building
               emphasizes  the  importance  of  embracing  circular   Demolition  Waste  Management:  A  way  ahead  for  India,”
               economy  principles  to  drive  innovation,  mitigate   Building  and  Environment,  vol.  222,  p.  109413,  2022.
               environmental  impact,  and  promote  a  more     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109413.
               sustainable and resilient built environment    [9].  H.-P.  Tserng,  C.-M.  Chou,  and  Y.-T.  Chang,  “The  key
                                                                 strategies  to  implement  the  circular  economy  in  building
                  7. CONCLUSION                                  projects—a case study of Taiwan,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no.
                  This  research  highlights  the  imperative  of   2, p. 754, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020754.
               embracing  circular  economy  principles  in  the   [10]. A. Mangialardo and E. Micelli, “Rethinking the Construction
               construction   sector   to   address   environmental   Industry  Under  the  Circular  Economy:  Principles  and  case
                                                                 studies,”  in  Smart  and  Sustainable  Planning  for  Cities  and
               challenges  and  promote  sustainable  development.   Regions, Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 333–344.
               Through  an  exploration  of  recycling  and  upcycling   http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75774-2, 23.
               initiatives,  the  study  underscores  their  potential  to   [11]. P. Kristensen, “European Council recommendations regarding
               enhance  resource  efficiency,  mitigate  environmental   the Commission Circular Economy Action Plan,” viewed Mar.
               impacts, and foster innovation. Key findings emphasize   4, 2024. https://doi.org/10.6027/6b6cb57e-en.
               the  economic  and  environmental  benefits  of  circular
               economy  practices,  including  waste  reduction,  cost
               savings,  and  improved  sustainability  credentials.
               Despite  identified  challenges  such  as  awareness  gaps
               and regulatory hurdles, successful case studies like The
               Edge  in  Amsterdam  demonstrate  the  transformative
               impact  of  circular  economy  strategies  in  construction
               projects. Overall, this research underscores the urgent
               need  for  industry-wide  adoption  of  circular  economy
               principles  and  calls  for  collaborative  efforts  to
               overcome  barriers  and  capitalize  on  opportunities  for
               promoting  resource  efficiency  and  sustainable
               development in the built environment. Further inquiry
               into longitudinal trends and technological innovations
               is essential to drive the construction industry towards a
               more sustainable future.
                              REFERENCES
               [1].  N. Sharma, P. P. Kalbar, and M. Salman, “Global review of
                  circular  economy  and  life  cycle  thinking  in  building
                  Demolition  Waste  Management:  A  way  ahead  for  India,”
                  Building  and  Environment,  Vol.  222,  p.  109413,  2022.
                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109413
               [2]. M.  Ghufran  et  al.,  “Circular  economy  in  the  construction
                  industry: A step towards sustainable development,” Buildings,
                  Vol.  12,  No.  7,  p.  1004,  2022.  https://doi.org/10.3390/
                  buildings12071004.
               [3]. Y. 杨奡, “The edge / PLP architecture,” ArchDaily, Apr. 22,
                  2016.    https://www.archdaily.com/785967/the-edge-plp-
                  architecture.
               [4].   A. B. Lovins, L. H. Lovins, and P. Hawken, “A road map for
                  natural capitalism,” in Understanding Business Environments,
                  Routledge,   2005,   pp.   257–270.   http://dx.doi.org/
                  10.4324/9780203992265-37.
               [5]. P. Kristensen, “European Council recommendations regarding
                  the  Commission  Circular  Economy  Action  Plan,”  2020.
                  https://doi.org/10.6027/6b6cb57e-en.
               [6]. Y.  Geng,  J.  Fu,  J.  Sarkis,  and  B.  Xue,  “Towards  a  national
                  circular economy indicator system in China: An evaluation and
               ISBN: 978-604-80-9779-0
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238