Page 103 - Kỷ yếu hội thảo khoa học quốc tế - Ứng dụng công nghệ mới trong công trình xanh , lần thứ 8

86 TRƯỜNG ĐẠI HỌC SƯ PHẠM KỸ THUẬT - ĐẠI HỌC ĐÀ NẴNG

The p-value of the remaining variables are higher Motorcycle Yes 362 86.8
more than a significance level (0.05) indicates a ownership
statistically not significant result, meaning no No 55 13.2
relationship exists between the variables being Bicycle Yes 74 17.7
studied. ownership No 343 82.3
The travel behavior of students in Danang, Yes 190 45.6
Vietnam is analyzed and modeled using a discrete Part-time job No 227 54.4
choice modeling approach. The developed Less than 3 88 21.1
multinomial transport logit model demonstrates good million VND
accuracy based on Table 6. As in previous studies, Living cost 3 million to 5 314 75.3
travel time is often found to be the main predictor of million VND
travel mode choice (Beirao and Cabral, 2007; Frank More than 5 15 3.6
et al., 2008). Motorcycles are the main means of million VND
transportation in developing countries, so it is not Table II. Distribution of transport modes and
surprising that this is also the most popular means of avarage travel time, travel distance
going to school for both male and female students. as well as travel cost
Students use motorbikes even when traveling short Average
distances that could be done by other, lower-cost Transport No. of Average travel Average
cost
alternatives such as walking or cycling. It is not mode respo Percentage travel distance (VND)
time (min)
ndent
possible to conclude why public transport modes (km)
(buses) are not widely used here. Walking 107 25.7 5.20 0.57 112
C. Figures and Tables Bicycle 23 5.5 8.61 1.48 1000
Motorcycle 267 64.0 14.58 6.62 5089
Bus 20 4.8 22.80 4.26 8100
Total 417 100
Table III. Frequency of independent variables
according to student’s transport modes
Var Transport mode Var Transport mode
Wa Bi Mo Bu Wa Bi Mo Bu
School location Gender
UTE 99 22 165 13 Male 48 10 249 11
Others 8 1 102 7 Female 59 13 18 9
Living status Year of students
Family 10 17 60 15 First 32 10 23 10
house
Figure 1. Research framework Rented 67 6 204 5 Second 34 6 72 23
house
Table I. Frequency of independent variables Campus 30 3 Third 24 4 108 72
Percentage Final 17 3 64 108
Variable Category Frequency (%) Rider license Motorcycle ownership
UTE 299 71.7 Yes 98 22 258 16 Yes 77 17 256 12
School
location Others 118 28.3 No 9 1 9 4 No 30 6 11 8
First 75 18.0 Bicycle ownership Part-time job
Yes 11 21 42 20 Yes 34 17 132 7
Second 119 28.5
Year of No 96 2 225 20 No 73 6 135 13
students Third 138 33.1 Living cost (million VND) Cost Transform (VND)
Final 85 20.4
Less 1000-
Family house 102 24.5 than 3 24 20 62 18 2000 107 23 20 13
Living status Rented house 282 67.6 3 2000-
million 83 1 193 2 267 7
Campus 33 7.9 to 5 6000
Yes 394 94.5 More 107 23 12 20 6000- 13
Rider license than 5 12000
No 23 5.5
Travel distance Transform (km) Reason for mode choice
ISBN: 978-604-80-9122-4